Re: writing an own version of setq?

[Thomas Link]

> > Setting the variable with setq or defvar is ok for you?
>
>
> Hmm, what do you mean? I do not understand...

Well ... ah ... Me neither. But I think I meant: I had the idea that it 
could also be useful to check if the symbol hasn't been bound yet -- 
using either setq or defvar etc. This could be done by replacing 
custom-saved-p with boundp. So the question was: considering this 
possibility, this is no issue for you?

Cheers,
Thomas.