[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m
From: |
mr.sparkle |
Subject: |
Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m |
Date: |
04 Nov 2002 19:41:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002, blackwolf@pcisys.net wrote:
> I've been using w3 off-and-on in the past, but since I'm trying to
> go far more text-centric on my desktop[1] I'd like to do the little
> web browsing that I do from within Emacs. I've downloaded w3
> v4.0pre.47 and have been getting that nasty ``wrong type argument:
> stringp, nil'' error[2] that's been mentioned lately. Anyone have
> an opinion[3] on W3 vs. emacs-w3m?
>
> [1] Full-screen xterm running screen, with a Mozilla tab (using the
> PWM window manager) as a last resort.
>
> [2] No, I haven't tried to get a backtrace ... sorry.
>
> [3] Heh
I found w3 to be sloooooow. emacs-w3m is reasonably fast and it
renders html nicely. I use emacs-w3m as the browser for html files in
dired and I have no complaints so far.
- Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Michael J. Barillier, 2002/11/03
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Adam P., 2002/11/03
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Henrik Enberg, 2002/11/03
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, A. Lucien Meyers, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Henrik Enberg, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Oliver Scholz, 2002/11/04
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Michael J. Barillier, 2002/11/05
- Message not available
- Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m, Jay Belanger, 2002/11/05
Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m,
mr.sparkle <=