[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET
From: |
Benjamin Lewis |
Subject: |
Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:36:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
On 13 Nov 2002, joao@teaser.fr wrote:
> Benjamin Lewis <bclewis@cs.sfu.ca> writes:
>
>>
>> What does M-x gnus-version RET say?
>
> Gnus v5.8.8
>From the GNUS-NEWS file, under "* Changes in Oort Gnus":
,---
| ** MML (Mime compose) prefix changed from `M-m' to `C-c C-m'.
| This change was made to avoid conflict with the standard binding of
| `back-to-indentation', which is also useful in message mode.
`---
The tutorial you were reading must have been updated for Oort, even if it
claimed otherwise.
--
Benjamin Lewis
Amoebit:
Amoeba/rabbit cross; it can multiply and divide at the same time.
- Getting back C-m instead of RET, xxx, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Michael Slass, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Michael Slass, 2002/11/11
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/12
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Benjamin Lewis, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, joao, 2002/11/13
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET,
Benjamin Lewis <=
- Re: Getting back C-m instead of RET, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/14