Re: Possible emacs bug.

[Barry Margolin]

In article <84k7j4au5k.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>,
Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de> wrote:
>Edric M Ellis <eellis@mathworks.co.uk> writes:
>
>> This seems to be because of the way ``beginning-of-defun'' works.
>
>Whee.  I think it's fine that beginning-of-defun takes some shortcuts
>for indentation and movement, but maybe C-M-x should produce a more
>correct result?  OTOH, then it might take very long for C-M-x to do
>its thing.

All the commands that operate on on a "defun" use the same definition of
what a function definition is.  This is good for consistency, and also for
performance.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.