help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: anti-alias


From: Alan Shutko
Subject: Re: anti-alias
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:38:03 GMT
User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

Francesco Scaglioni <fgs@epulse.net> writes:

> I can run an emacs in terminal mode within an anti-aliased xterm --
> does anyone know of a way to run a straight emacs under X with font
> anti-aliasing? 

Can't be done (yet).

-- 
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
Unauthorized damage of regulation book is strictly against regulations
>From GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Fri Dec 13 09:58:26 2002
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
        id 18MrGG-0001hB-00
        for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:57:56 -0500
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
        id 18MrEy-0000XU-00
        for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:56:37 -0500
Received: from mixing.qc.dfo-mpo.gc.ca ([216.226.40.21] helo=mixing.qc.dfo.ca)
        by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
        id 18MrCm-0006wZ-00
        for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:54:20 -0500
Received: from mixing.qc.dfo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mixing.qc.dfo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id DE94E297CD; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:53:24 -0500 (EST)
To: David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de>
In-Reply-To: Message from David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de> 
   of "13 Dec 2002 10:35:24 +0100." <x5u1hi1ctf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> 
References: <84u1ihbac1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
        <x5isxysxk1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <84vg1ytia3.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
        <x5u1hi1ctf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> 
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.0+cvs; nmh 1.0.4+dev; Emacs 21.2
X-Face: "#bYm%*(4JuXAkouMxaLz|M2dbXUFnQ"IRX)zpsiM"(B}`#|_b548$VB}5L&VIck1F#FNc'
        rsASk0?-/gFp2qzM>0]`Jc}Qd<8[l)N7{8%qMN~{|DS.ME.$
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:53:24 -0500
From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
Message-Id: <20021213145324.DE94E297CD@mixing.qc.dfo.ca>
cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
cc: auc-tex@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: AUC-TeX completion fails to offer some possibilities 
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
        <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
        <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:58:26 -0000

David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de> wrote:

> Please do.  We need every improvement we can get.  Other worthwhile
> tasks:
>
> f) a good extensible syntax highlighting scheme for packages and of
> course, use of it.

I posted yesterday on auc-tex@sunsite.dk, addressing this, with the
subject line:

 Re: How to add font-lock support for new commands? 

I didn't see the message go by.  I was anxious to hear comments.  Did
you see it?

Peter



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]