[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic Compiling
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Automatic Compiling |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:17:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09002 (Oort Gnus v0.20) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Ulrich Dirr" <ud@art-satz.de> writes:
> At the moment /bin/emacs-21.2 have subdirs /bin, /etc, /info, /lisp,
> /lock (empty), and /site-lisp. I wanted to separate all packages which
> did not come with the standard installation (I used a precompiled bin
> version), e.g. /auctex, /leim, and /mule-ucs). Maybe the best idea is to
> put every local lisp package into /usr/local[/emacs]/site-lisp???
The Unix convention is to have a directory for a package. The
directory for Emacs could be /usr/local/emacs-21.2. Then this
directory contains subdirs bin, man, info, lib, share. The bin
directory contains the programs.
So, the Emacs executable would be /usr/local/emacs-21.2/bin/emacs.
But you have a directory c:/bin (or /c/bin or whatever) which is
named bin but does not contain programs. Instead, it contains a
subdir emacs-21.2 which contains subsubdirs...
So you could rename /c/bin to /c/sw or /c/local or /c/pkg or
something, and then David wouldn't have been surprised.
--
file-error; Data: (Opening input file no such file or directory ~/.signature)
- Automatic Compiling, Ulrich Dirr, 2003/04/27
- Re: Automatic Compiling, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/27
- Re: Automatic Compiling, David Kastrup, 2003/04/27
- Re: Automatic Compiling, Ulrich Dirr, 2003/04/28
- Re: Automatic Compiling, David Kastrup, 2003/04/28
- Re: Automatic Compiling, Ulrich Dirr, 2003/04/29
- Re: Automatic Compiling, David Kastrup, 2003/04/29
- Re: Automatic Compiling, Ulrich Dirr, 2003/04/29
- Re: Automatic Compiling, David Kastrup, 2003/04/29
- Re: Automatic Compiling, Ulrich Dirr, 2003/04/30
- Re: Automatic Compiling,
Kai Großjohann <=