[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coding Convections - Enabling a feature by loading a file
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Coding Convections - Enabling a feature by loading a file |
Date: |
04 Jun 2003 21:02:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> But this is only true if autoloads are generated. Is it standard
> practice to do that for files added to someones site directory or for a
> user under $HOME? I know I've never done that (I might start now that I
> think of it).
It's true that it's rarely done, but I think it should be fixed.
My install.el package embryo tries to do that by providing a standard way
for people to install a "package" and that procedure adds the
necessary autoloads.
> I'm not talking about a file are is part of Emacs, but one distributed
> separately. How strongly should we adhere to that coding convention?
Why should there be a difference ? After all, any unbundled package is
just a potential bundled package.
Stefan
PS: Another circumstance where a package might get loaded implicitly
is during byte-compilation. There's probably others.