[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rx vs sregex - a "match" to the death
From: |
Oliver Scholz |
Subject: |
Re: rx vs sregex - a "match" to the death |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:45:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Martin Stone Davis <m0davis@pacbell.net> writes:
> Who likes `rx'?
> Who likes `sregex'?
> Who likes `rx' more than `sregex'?
> Who likes `sregex' more than `rx'?
> Why?
>From the commentary section of rx.el:
This is another implementation of sexp-form regular expressions.
It was unfortunately written without being aware of the Sregex
package coming with Emacs, but as things stand, Rx completely
covers all regexp features, which Sregex doesn't, doesn't suffer
from the bugs mentioned in the commentary section of Sregex, and
uses a nicer syntax (IMHO, of course :-).
Personally I don't know about the nicer syntax, because I never tried
sregex. For the very reason that I discovered rx first.
Oliver
--
14 Vendémiaire an 212 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!