[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canonical add-hook idiom
From: |
Oliver Scholz |
Subject: |
Re: Canonical add-hook idiom |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:25:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bob Nelson <bnelson@nelsonbe.com> writes:
> What is the preferred approach given these examples:
>
> 1). (add-hook 'some-mode-hook (lambda () [...]
> 2). (add-hook 'some-mode-hook '(lambda () [...]
> 3). (add-hook 'some-mode-hook (function (lambda () [...]
> 4). None of the above -- please explain.
[...]
I definitely prefer (1).
Some would prefer #'(lambda () ...), which for the Lisp interpreter
is the same as (3). But AFAIK this is just a Common Lisp idiom and
it makes no difference in Emacs Lisp.
Oliver
--
25 Brumaire an 212 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!