[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"undo" really can replace "redo"
From: |
niDapeng |
Subject: |
"undo" really can replace "redo" |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:21:36 +0800 (CST) |
I know Emacs use "killing-ring" concept to cicle undo, and 'redo' operation is
implicitly done under this cicle. But, is it really good way?
When I set killing-ring size enough large, the "redo" is turing very boring
when I miss the correct position of ring.
For instance, if my current killing-ring size is 200, I try to undo last the
40th step operation, but, unfortunately, I undo 41 times. At this case, I have
2 choices, one is keep undoing until the cycle is back(so boring, and I have to
very careful to prevent next mistake). Another way, is I manually to mend the
41th operation(maybe type some text again).
Hi, Emacs gurus, my "redo" concept is correctly? I have to be familiar such
operation? Certainly, I know there is redo.el available for this. But why emacs
doesn't take "redo" as default package?
Thanks
Dapeng
----------------------------------------------
ÍæÓÎÏ·Ó®ÊýÂëÏà»ú¡¢MP3¡¢UÅÌ
http://mail.21cn.com/huodong/0310/
ÖÐÃÀÈÕº«¸ßÖÐÉúÐÔµ÷²é:ÈÕÅ®ÉúÐÔ¹ÛÄî×·Å
http://news.21cn.com/huahua/
¹ã¶«ADSLÓû§ÓÐ×ÅÊý£¬21CNÉÌÎñÓÊÃâ·ÑÁì
http://mail.21cn.com/vip
Ï£À°Ç°×ÜÀíÓëÃÀÑÞ¿Õ½ãÄÖ³öÌÒÉ«ÐÔ³óÎÅ(ͼ)
http://news.21cn.com/social/
- "undo" really can replace "redo",
niDapeng <=