[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mode-specific sexps
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: mode-specific sexps |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:27:01 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Note that the syntax of sexps is not quite right for use in all
> modes. For example, <1000 is considered to be one sexp and you can
> legitimately set it in lisp modes -- (setq <1000 10) -- however, in
> LaTeX mode I think this should be regarded as two sexps, a `<'
> together with a `1000'. Advice on to change the definition of a
> sexp for LaTeX mode would be appreciated. My initial investigations
> led to `scan-sexps' but this is in C code and I'm hesitant about
> messing with that if I don't need to.
Read the section about syntax-tables in the elisp manual.
It won't answer your question, but it should hopefully help you rewrite your
question so we can give you a more useful answer.
If the question was
how do I get (forward-sexp 2) to step over "<1111", then the answer is
somewhere between "you can't" and "maybe try forward-sexp-function".
-- Stefan