[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
|
From: |
Kevin Rodgers |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:49:26 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) |
Leonardo Boiko wrote:
> C-u - n M-u, where "n" is a digit (or nothing for upcasing just the last
> word). M-u, M-l and M-c rocks.
`M--' is even easier to type than `C-u -', especially when followed by
another Meta-key.
--
Kevin Rodgers
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/12/01
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Kevin Rodgers <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/12/03
- Re: emacs for everything?, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/12/04
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Combs, 2004/12/05
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Combs, 2004/12/05
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/12/05
- Re: emacs for everything?, David Combs, 2004/12/26
- Re: emacs for everything?, Ravi Uday, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Neon Absentius, 2004/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Ravi Uday, 2004/12/30
- Re: emacs for everything?, Christian Plate, 2004/12/30