[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Use ido for *all* completion?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Use ido for *all* completion? |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:44:33 -0800 |
> AFAIK, you can use `ido-completing-read' as a general replacement for
> `completing-read'.
> CCing ido's author, in case he has an idea about this.
Excuse me, did you actually take the time to try M-x icomplete-mode?
Why? I replied to a question about `ido-completing-read' with some info
about `ido-completing-read'.
You said:
I don't think that ido can do this (yet I don't /know/ either that it
can not.)
I replied to that, as well as to the original question:
> Is there a way to use ido's magical completion for everything?
- Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- RE: Use ido for *all* completion?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Peter Lee, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/09