[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?
From: |
Oliver Scholz |
Subject: |
Re: Use ido for *all* completion? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:22:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> writes:
> Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> Yes.
>
> And don't you agree that while they both show available completions,
> icomplete is nowhere near ido when it comes to functionality? Or am I
> missing something?
I don't recall having seen any list of required functionality. I do
remember that somebody wanted to use ido for other sorts of
completion. Such things most of the time mean: people want to have a
particular functionality and express that as "can X also do Y?" So
before we jump on anything without consideration and merge
gnu.emacs.help and emacs-devel, it would be quite more methodical to
find the least difficult way to achieve the required functionality.
Oliver
--
20 Ventôse an 213 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!
- Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/08
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- RE: Use ido for *all* completion?, Drew Adams, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?,
Oliver Scholz <=
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Peter Lee, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/09