[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?
From: |
Mark Plaksin |
Subject: |
Re: Use ido for *all* completion? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>>> CVS Emacs finally broke lightning completion[1] for me so I decided to
>>>> look at ido.
>>>
>>> Please report it via M-x report-emacs-bug.
>
>> Do you mean I should report that I'd like ido-like completion for
>> everything?
>
> Well, you could do that too, but I mostly meant that you should report that
> Emacs-CVS breaks lightning.el.
Heh. The problem with lightning completion turned out to be a bad test. It
tested for Emacs 21 with
(= emacs-major-version 21)
instead of
(>= emacs-major-version 21)
Changing the defconst to this fixed the problem:
(defconst lc-emacs-21-p
(and (boundp 'emacs-major-version)
(not lc-xemacs-p)
(>= emacs-major-version 21))
"Non-nil if using GNU Emacs >= 21.")
I still plan to try to make ido work for all minibuffer completion.
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, (continued)
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/09
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Oliver Scholz, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Peter Lee, 2005/03/10
- Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Mark Plaksin, 2005/03/10
Re: Use ido for *all* completion?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/09