[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:32:44 +0200 |
> From: Joe Corneli <jcorneli@math.utexas.edu>
> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:11:40 -0600
>
> This feature is off by default as well. Something in your .emacs
> turns it on.
>
> Saying that things are "off by default" and "something in your .emacs
> turns them on" is not really what anyone needs to hear
In this case, the OP was complaining about things that are turned on
by default on him. So I think the response was appropriate, and
precisely what he needed to hear, since he should look for the reasons
in his own customizations.
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, David Kastrup, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Bad iso-2022-jp encoding (was: Is Emacs becoming Word?), Reiner Steib, 2005/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, David Kastrup, 2005/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Henrik Enberg, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/25
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/26
Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/26
Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Steinar Børmer, 2005/03/27
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/27
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Greg Novak, 2005/03/27
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Thomas A. Horsley, 2005/03/27
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Henrik Enberg, 2005/03/27
- Re: Is Emacs becoming Word?, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/28