[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs and osx
From: |
Jochem Huhmann |
Subject: |
Re: emacs and osx |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:18:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) |
Bob Hunter <catdogbeloved@yahoo.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> there are a few ports of emacs to osx, and it is unclear whether the
> efforts are merging into the main gnu source code.
These "ports" are AFAIK nothing else than compiled CVS-Emacsen, spiced
up with some additional keybindings and such.
OK, there is somewhere a Cocoa version of an ancient Emacs, based on
earlier work to port Emacs to NeXTStep. I don't know if it's that easy
to merge this into the main (current) code...
> In principle, one should be able to download the latest from gnu and
> compile autonomously under osx, with no need to download old
> out-of-sync binaries.
Exactly. Get the latest Emacs from the CVS, configure, make, install,
enjoy. It just works. This posting is written with a Emacs running on
Mac OS X, along with Carbon-GUI, anti-aliased fonts and everything,
compiled straight from the sources.
> I wonder what refrains the individual projects to work in a joint
> effort, to finally deliver this port, as osx is now in its fourth
> major release.
I guess as soon as there is a formal release of a new major Emacs
version, you will have a more or less "official" package. It's just that
there is (right now) nothing to "deliver", because there is not a
release yet.
BTW: All this chaos is not limited to Emacs. Look for almost any Open
Source app and you will find at least two or three different "ports" to
OS X floating around the net. There is Fink, darwinports and then
individual (binary) packages done by well-meaning people. Ever installed
a LaTeX system on OS X? I've been going through this just yesterday and
I can tell you, this is a hell of a mess. The average Linux- or
BSD-Distribution is lightyears ahead in terms of package management and
discipline among the porters. Apple made a terrible mistake by not
including a decent package management system along with a server
infrastructure right from the beginning, IMHO.
Jochem
--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
- emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Sébastien Kirche, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx,
Jochem Huhmann <=
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Bob Hunter, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, David Kastrup, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Miles Bader, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Miles Bader, 2005/04/13
- Re: emacs and osx, Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/13