[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:42:54 +0300 |
> From: drkm <usenet@fgeorges.org>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:08:43 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Sorry, I don't see how a package-system could solve the bulk of the
> > problems here. In my experience, the problem with Windows is that
> > there's no coherent set of tools and ports that will all work
> > seamlessly with Emacs
>
> Then, if Emacs has its own package system (as a set of ELisp
> libraries), there is no more need to such tools.
??? You mean, we should implement a speller, a typesetter, all the
programs in Coreutils, etc., all in Emacs Lisp? IMHO, that'd be a
terrible waste of scarce resources.
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, (continued)
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Pascal Bourguignon, 2005/06/04
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Shug Boabby, 2005/06/04
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, David Kastrup, 2005/06/04
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Fabrice Popineau, 2005/06/06
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, David Kastrup, 2005/06/06
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Pascal Bourguignon, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Klaus Berndl, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, David Kastrup, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/05
- Message not available
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, drkm, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, drkm, 2005/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/05
- [HS] Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, drkm, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Shug Boabby, 2005/06/05
- Re: "Easy" Windows Emacs, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/06/06