[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A true challenge for Emac and Elisp hackers - at Least I think so
From: |
Chris McMahan |
Subject: |
Re: A true challenge for Emac and Elisp hackers - at Least I think so |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:20:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Ahh functional specs... :)
- Chris
Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> writes:
> Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawomir.nowaczyk.847@student.lu.se> writes:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:29:54 +0200
>> Matthieu Moy <MatthieuNOSPAM.Moy@imag.fr.invalid> wrote:
>> #> Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawomir.nowaczyk.847@student.lu.se> writes:
>> #>
>> #> > 2) Write a function which does what you want and bind it to RET key
>> #> > *) the function should check if buffer name ends with *.c
>> #>
>> #> Better: bind this function only in c-mode and c++-mode. No test needed
>> #> in the command itself.
>>
>> Well, my system reports c++-mode for *.h files as well. Original
>> poster specifically asked the function to apply to *.c files only.
>
> That was probably a mis-statement of the original poster's intent,
> since it's not unheard of to have macros with real C or C++ code in
> header files too :)
>
--
(. .)
=ooO=(_)=Ooo=====================================
Chris McMahan | first_initiallastname@one.dot.net
=================================================
Re: A true challenge for Emac and Elisp hackers - at Least I think so, Pascal Bourguignon, 2005/10/12
RE: A true challenge for Emac and Elisp hackers - at Least I think so, Drew Adams, 2005/10/12
Re: A true challenge for Emac and Elisp hackers - at Least I think so, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/12