[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:21:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Brian Elmegaard <brian@rkspeed-rugby.dk> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> You likely did something wrong.
>
> I guess so, but how can it go wrong in batchmode only?
Because there is something in your code that does something different
in batchmode. batchmode happens to be different. Not least of all,
because there is no current window and several initialization files
don't get loaded.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/01
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Ian Zimmerman, 2005/12/02
- Message not available
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/03
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/03
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, David Kastrup, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode?, Brian Elmegaard, 2005/12/07