[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:47:19 -0800 |
There are several ways you can do this. You can use the arrow
keys or you can use C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n. The latter can be
more efficient in some situations, because it keeps your hands in
the standard position. These characters are equivalent to the
four arrow keys like this:
You can use the arrow keys or `C-p', `C-n', `C-b', and `C-f':
[up], `C-p' - blah blah
[down], `C-n' - blah blah
[left], `C-b' - blah blah
[right], `C-f' - blah blah
That says everything that needs to be said. There is no need to explain the
clever design, make claims about efficiency, or reference "standard
position" (do you wonder what that is?).
People are smart enough to pick the alternatives they like. The important
thing here is to let them know 1) that there are alternatives, and 2) which
alternatives correspond to which.
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, (continued)
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Tim Johnson, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Björn Lindström, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, don provan, 2005/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Per Abrahamsen, 2005/12/15
- RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/15