Re: Emacs for Windows?

[David Kastrup]

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 16 2006, B. T. Raven wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Klaus. I am right to conclude that
>> emacs+auctex-w32-2006-01-29.zip
>> will unzip to the latest precompiled binary(s)? 
>
> Not the latest, but those as of 2006-01-29.
>
>> Has leim been included in this or is that still a separate package?
>
> Included.
>
>> Is there any reason I might not want this as opposed to
>> emacs+auctex-w32-2005-12-19.zip
>> for example? Were any important changes made in those 6 weeks?
>
> Depends very much on _your_ definition of "important".  IIRC, the
> differences between the 2006-01-29 and 2005-12-19 are rather minor.
> If you don't have one installed yet, pick the newest.

It is possible that the newer one does not have working mouse-1 links
in gnus article buffers.  Very annoying, that.  The later however
includes a newer version of AUCTeX IIRC.

Time we got another version out...

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum