Re: setq and setq-default

[robert . thorpe]

David Kastrup wrote:
> robert.thorpe@antenova.com writes:
>
> > Emacs is rather like an object orientated system.
>
> Proud claim.

I said "rather like".  I was trying to analogise it to something the OP
may be familiar with.

>  Probably means something like: if it breaks, you get to
> keep the pieces, and each of them may further break in its own way.

Don't we get to keep the bits? ;)

I could have said it was an object disorientated system or an "objects
are theft" system.  But I was trying to be restrained.