apropos inconsistancy

[Tim Johnson]

:-) Don't ask me to speak the subject before I have my coffee.

Seriously, Apropos on emacs sometimes gives me much less than Xemacs
does. More often certain items that appear in xemacs do not appear
in GNU emacs (with apropos) , whereas ch f will match them.

Here is an example:
c-h a split <ret>

  Xemacs shows me 'split-string
  emacs does not

Could it be be that I have a misconfiguration in my emacs
setup that interferes with apropos?

Thanks
tim

-- 
Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
      http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com