[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: handling parenthesis and quotes
From: |
Adam |
Subject: |
Re: handling parenthesis and quotes |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:32:02 +1300 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.9.2 |
Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> + Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> |> From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no>
> |> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:24:51 +0100
> |> |
> |> | (shell "grep -i \"\(define \" ~/mydir/myfile?.lisp")
> |>
> |> Much easier to use the single quote for the shell command.
> |
> | But double quotes are more portable, as the Windows shells support
> | them, but don't support '...' quoting.
>
> Oh. I didn't know that. But single quotes are more portable, as es
> and rc both support them, but not "...".
>
> Er, never mind.
>
> Oh, but I am confused now, because shell doesn't even take a command
> as an argument. Did the OP mean shell-command? And *that* isn't
> really portable either, if you wish to obsess about it, because (a) by
> default it uses the user's login shell, and (b) as you pointed out,
> different OSes have different kinds of shells anyhow.
>
> In summary, if you wish to use shell-command portably on unix you need
> to wrap (let ((explicit-shell-file-name "/bin/sh")) ...) around it.
>
> (Disclaimer: I use a CVS emacs, so that variable may not be available
> on older emacsen for all I know.)
Thanks for your interest. And the Windows or more
general non-portable case is interesting.
No - I just wanted a grepped list to pop up
in my Emacs Slime *inferior-lisp* buffer, my
user login shell works fine for this.
A related newbie question might be, is this the
usual approach for 'incremental programming' by
Lisp users ? That is; write a function,
then append that function to a file of work
with append-to-file ?
This creates a file of functions that need
to be listed from time to time. The grep thing
works well for now.
Perhaps that file will become a package for
slime-set-package slime-profile-package
or preferably something more Emacs native.
Am I on track with my understanding of this
so far as 'incremental programming'?
- handling parenthesis and quotes, Adam, 2007/01/23
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/01/23
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Adam, 2007/01/23
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2007/01/24
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/24
- Message not available
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2007/01/24
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes,
Adam <=
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2007/01/24
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Adam, 2007/01/25
- Re: handling parenthesis and quotes, Tim X, 2007/01/26