[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:53:51 +0200 |
> From: "Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com>
> Date: 9 Feb 2007 09:26:56 -0800
>
> If I didn't interact with so many people who use Outlook I'd probably
> use it for email.
What prevents you from using Emacs for email, even though your
correspondents use Outlook? In other words, what's so special with
Outlook that Emacs cannot cope with?
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, (continued)
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Joost Kremers, 2007/02/08
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, William Case, 2007/02/11
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, William Case, 2007/02/11
- Message not available
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Hadron, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert D. Crawford, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Rjjd, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert Thorpe, 2007/02/09
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
Message not available
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Edward Dodge, 2007/02/14