[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to redefine Parantheses?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: How to redefine Parantheses? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:53:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.96 (gnu/linux) |
* Eli Zaretskii (2007-04-11) writes:
>> From: Ralf Angeli <dev.null@caeruleus.net>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:50:39 +0200
>>
>> We are running round in circles.
>
> Maybe you are; I ain't. You asked me to explain what behavior I like
> about the current syntax, and I answered. It is okay to disagree;
> there's certainly no need to reiterate why you dislike the current
> behavior, because you already stated that.
I tried to clarify why changing the default syntax is better than
leaving it. In addition I provided information on what to expect from
changing the syntax by example of AUCTeX. Please don't just ignore
that.
--
Ralf
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/09
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/09
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/10
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/04/10
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/11
Re: How to redefine Parantheses?, Peter Dyballa, 2007/04/08
Message not available