[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EmacsW32 invocation options
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: EmacsW32 invocation options |
Date: |
Thu, 3 May 2007 15:26:24 +0200 |
On 5/3/07, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
I have often found in the development world that sometimes "additional
thought" is a euphemism for "not today, not tomorrow, maybe in a few
years when I have nothing better to do". There are times when it can
benefit a development to let the young guns go blazing and see what
happens. Sometimes :-;
Yeah, well, I don't think that was the case right now.
And one fairly easy to answer - yes.
I was suggesting that there are other good questions.
But note the important bit - "from
those who actually use it".
Irrelevant, I think. Everybody involved in the emacsclient discussion
were also emacsclient users.
Juanma
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Brian Elmegaard, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/04
- Message not available
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Brian Elmegaard, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Hadron, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/03
- Message not available
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Hadron, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/04