Re: CPerl Indentation after subs with print in their names

[David Combs]

In article <85zlx0hzph.fsf@usenet.my.skamphausen.de>,
Stefan Kamphausen  <skampi@gmx.net> wrote:
>Hi Ilya,
>
>Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> writes:
>
>>> Nevertheless, it was wasted time on my side (comparing those files)
>>> and on yours (writing posts) which could have been saved if there were
>>> some comments at the beginning of the file that explained the way
>>> things are.
>>
>> Ha, I see you presume people would read what is "at the beginning of
>> the file"!  And where you think this "beginning" is, before/after
>> license/changelog, or where?
>
>Can't tell.  I won't even assume that other people read all that, but
>/I/ do and I always write my stuff as if others would, too :-)
>
>Hm, let's see ... there is this comment:
>
>;; DO NOT FORGET to read micro-docs (available from `Perl' menu)   <<<<<<
>;; or as help on variables `cperl-tips', `cperl-problems',         <<<<<<
>;; `cperl-praise', `cperl-speed'.                                 <<<<<<
>
>Somewhere close to that would be a good idea maybe.  Or it could be a
>micro-doc itself.  cperl-development or cperl-versions or
>cperl-maintenance or something like that.  
>
>>   [If you can agree on that, I put it into my TODO ;-]
>
>:-)

A probably-stupid question: what's a "micro-doc"?

Some kind of emacs terminology?  Or cperl's, maybe?


I googled it ("micro doc" emacs), and it came up
with this very thread!

Thanks!

David