Re: Is there a mod-emacs?

[Tim X]

Mathias Dahl <brakjoller@gmail.com> writes:

> Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null> writes:
>
>> Another approach that might be interesting is to create an emacs
>> lisp package for common lisp. You could then take advantage of
>> mod_lisp. Not sure how you would handle the lisp1 vs lisp2
>> differences
>
> Both are Lisp2, aren't they? Maybe you thought about lexical vs
> dynamical scoping?

Your right - not sure where my head was at. The different scoping,
package/namspaces and things like buffer local variables etc were some of
the differences I was thinking about and not the seperation of
variable/function namespaces, function shadowing etc.

Tim 


-- 
tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au