[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add functions to C-mode?
From: |
David Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: Add functions to C-mode? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:39:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:28:46 +0200 Richard G. Riley wrote:
> David Hansen <david.hansen@gmx.net> writes:
>
>> Supporting one tiny feature doesn't make it a full implementation of
>> C99.
>>
>> David
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
>
> It's far from "one tiny feature".
Still there is AFAIK no C99 implementation, and I think GCC is far
leading here. If you want to write portable code it's better to not use
C99 features or at least limit yourself as much as feasible.
David
- Add functions to C-mode?, saneman, 2008/04/19
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Ph . Ivaldi, 2008/04/19
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, David Hansen, 2008/04/19
- Message not available
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Jason Rumney, 2008/04/19
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, David Hansen, 2008/04/20
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/20
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, David Hansen, 2008/04/20
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/20
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, David Hansen, 2008/04/22
- Message not available
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Richard G Riley, 2008/04/20
- Re: Add functions to C-mode?,
David Hansen <=
Re: Add functions to C-mode?, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/04/20
Message not available