[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TeX vs LaTeX
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: TeX vs LaTeX |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:13:18 +0200 |
Am 17.06.2008 um 11:10 schrieb Sébastien Vauban:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\textem{example} % `font-latex-sedate-face'
\em{example} % `font-latex-italic-face' on `font-latex-sedate-
face'
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The only difference is the italic applied on the same face...
Because \textem{} is neither LaTeX nor TeX but something you might
have invented. I can't find it my LaTeX Companion, second edition,
from January 2005 ...
The is not much sense in distinguishing between so-called "TeX" and
so-called "LaTeX." LaTeX understands TeX quite well. Do you change
your voice or do something else while speaking and using a word that
has its origin in Latin or one that has Celtic or Scandinavian
ancestors or one that has been taken over from English or German?
I think it's possible to work through all available TeX sources on
CTAN and determine the few thousand code words that they get
fontified differently then obvious LaTeX code words.
--
Greetings
Pete
One-Shot Case Study, n.:
The scientific equivalent of the four-leaf clover, from
which it is concluded all clovers possess four leaves
and are sometimes green.
- TeX vs LaTeX, Sébastien Vauban, 2008/06/16
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Joel J. Adamson, 2008/06/16
- Message not available
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Sébastien Vauban, 2008/06/17
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX,
Peter Dyballa <=
- Message not available
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Sébastien Vauban, 2008/06/17
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Joost Kremers, 2008/06/17
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Sébastien Vauban, 2008/06/17
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Joost Kremers, 2008/06/17
- Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Peter Dyballa, 2008/06/17
Re: TeX vs LaTeX, Marcel Korpel, 2008/06/17