[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: basic question: going back to dired
From: |
Nikolaj Schumacher |
Subject: |
Re: basic question: going back to dired |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:12:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:19, Miles Bader <miles.bader@necel.com> wrote:
>
>> "C-x" in general is a prefix for "major" commands, and "C-c" was
>> historically used to kill a program (you could question the significance
>> of "C-c" itself, but it was used so universally, its meaning was quite
>> firmly established).
>>
>> Thus "C-x C-c" is a fairly logical binding, if you ask me.
>
> Well, C-c to me has the meaning of "killing a program", yes, which,
> Emacs terminology notwithstanding, is not the same as exiting a
> program (yes, I know that many programs do orderly exits after a C-c,
> but to my Windows-tainted eyes, C-c is using violence against the
> unsuspecting process).
>
>> Now, the logic behind "Alt-F4" is, ... what, exactly?
>
> It is as arbitrary as C-c to killing a program, or C-x for major
> commands. And it is (in a Windows context) obviously related to Alt-F4
> to close a document.
Actually Alt-F4 closes a window (frame), which I believe is bound to
C-x 5 0 in Emacs. Both are about as arbitrary as shortcuts can get.
Can we move on now?
regards,
Nikolaj Schumacher
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/25
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Sean Sieger, 2008/07/30
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/31
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Phil Carmody, 2008/07/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Miles Bader, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired,
Nikolaj Schumacher <=
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, xraysmalevich, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/24
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/26
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/31
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juan Manuel Menéndez Bellón, 2008/07/31
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/31