[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %
|
From: |
Jason Rumney |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs equivalent of vi % |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:51:33 -0700 (PDT) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Aug 14, 7:50 am, Nikolaj Schumacher <n_schumac...@web.de> wrote:
> Oups, that's not all...
> It won't work, because `buffer-file-name' will of course return the
> minibuffer's file name (i.e. none). I'm currently not aware of an easy
> way to get the originating buffer from the minibuffer. Sorry.
(window-buffer (minibuffer-selected-window))
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, (continued)
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Rustom Mody, 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Rustom Mody, 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Kevin Rodgers, 2008/08/13
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Rustom Mody, 2008/08/14
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/14
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Kevin Rodgers, 2008/08/14
- Message not available
- Re: emacs equivalent of vi %,
Jason Rumney <=
RE: emacs equivalent of vi %, Arnaldo Mandel, 2008/08/13
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Xah, 2008/08/13
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Scott Frazer, 2008/08/13
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Emmett Grogan, 2008/08/15
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Xah, 2008/08/15
Re: emacs equivalent of vi %, Chat, 2008/08/16