[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to get rid of *GNU Emacs* buffer on start-up?
From: |
Richard Riley |
Subject: |
Re: How to get rid of *GNU Emacs* buffer on start-up? |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:19:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
stan <smoore@exis.net> writes:
> Richard Riley wrote:
>> stan <smoore@exis.net> writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley wrote:
>>>> stan <smoore@exis.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Xah wrote:
>>>>>> Kevin Rodgers wrote:
>>>>>>
> <snip>
>>> The point wasn't really about intuitiveness, that of course in the eye
>>> of the beholder. I certainly didn't wake up one day thinking in terms of
>>> emacs chords; I had to learn them. I don't really think emacs is worse
>>> than vim, wordstar, ed, edlin, or any of a dozen proprietary things I've
>>> been forced to endure. I expect to have some learning, and I don't
>>> expect it to match windows.
>>>
>>> My point was that generalizing about editor users is at best difficult
>>> and most often impossible. Arguments like "people are confused" are
>>> silly and not persuasive. Some are confused and others are happy as
>>> clams.
>>
>> Only if one thinks in B&W. I think it was fairly obvious that Xah was
>> not suggesting for one minute that 100% of people were confused.
>
> I think you missed the point here. It's not B&W it's also the grey. The
> NUMBER doesn't matter. It could be all, none, or something in between.
Uhm, that was my point :-;