[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some vi equivalents please?
From: |
Giorgos Keramidas |
Subject: |
Re: some vi equivalents please? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:40:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) |
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT), rustom <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well the post here was as messed up as on the emacswiki -- Sorry
> Shortening the lines and trying again.
That's web-based readers for you. You can never tell what they are
_really_ going to post, until *after* you have posted it and see how the
text arrived back in your incoming news feed.
The table seems useful. I'll try to reformat it in the Wiki itself.
Thanks for writing it :)
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, Kevin Rodgers, 2008/11/01
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, rustom, 2008/11/01
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, rustom, 2008/11/01
- Re: some vi equivalents please?,
Giorgos Keramidas <=
- RE: some vi equivalents please?, Drew Adams, 2008/11/01
- Message not available
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, rustom, 2008/11/02
- RE: some vi equivalents please?, Drew Adams, 2008/11/02
- Message not available
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, rustom, 2008/11/03
- RE: some vi equivalents please?, Drew Adams, 2008/11/03
- Re: some vi equivalents please?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2008/11/03
Re: some vi equivalents please?, Ken Goldman, 2008/11/05