[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m question
From: |
Richard Riley |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m question |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:13:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> writes:
> Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Xavier> For your information, many old computers do not have
> > Xavier> Up/Down/Left/Right keys thus making this as a default won't
> work
> > Xavier> for them. I never use these key due to my habits. Therefor
> > Xavier> I strongly disagree with you on that point.
> >
> > Defaults are for newcomers to quickly get hands on the thing.
> >
> > I do not see why defaults should apply to newcomers, really.
> > Defaults must apply to the mass (either power users or newcomers).
> >
> > Xavier
>
> The mass have arrow keys. As do 99.99999999999999999% of all new comers.
>
> Yes I have it on my laptop but I never used them because they are
> located to an improbable and unpractical location.
>
> Xavier
With all due respect, the location of the arrow keys on one laptop seem
a dubious pivot for making decisions for a configurable base product
which is aimed at a wide and varied user base. The great majority have
arrow keys, the HW manufacturers built them in ( I haven't seen a keyboard
without them for years). To ignore them because of a minorities poorly
designed, antiquated or specialised HW seems somewhat silly.
Are they the *best* things for hard core Emacs user? Possibly
not. Would a lot of users be confused if they did not work as common
sense dictates? Almost certainly.
Having said that, I'm sure you are not arguing against configuring
them.
Re: emacs-w3m question, Xavier Maillard, 2008/11/03
Re: emacs-w3m question, Xah, 2008/11/03