[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any advantages to recompile Emacs...
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any advantages to recompile Emacs... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:20:33 +0200 |
> From: Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Web.DE>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:47 +0100
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
>
> Am 22.01.2009 um 20:44 schrieb Francis Moreau:
>
> > emacs 22.2 with X support: ~ 8.0Mo
> > emacs 23 without X support: ~ 14.5Mo
> >
> > It's a huge difference, so now I'm wondering if I correctly built the
> > beast...
> >
> > Any Idea ?
>
> Think of Unicode (8 bit -> 32 bit)!
Unicode per se has no effect on the size of the Emacs binary, since
the internal representation of characters used by Emacs 23 is a
multibyte representation, as it was in previous versions of Emacs.