Re: lexical-let detail semantics

[Daniel Kraft]

A.Politz wrote:
> On Jul 27, 11:50 am, Daniel Kraft <d...@domob.eu> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm happy that lexical-let works well to build closures (and in fact it
> > seems that this is the main intention for lexical-let at all); however
> > this code does not work as expected:
> >
> > (setq a 1)
> > (lexical-let ((a 2))
> >    ((lambda () (print a))))
> >    => 1
>
> I don't know, but this prints `2' in my emacs (GNU Emacs 22.3.1).

I'm using 21.3.1, and there it is 1; but I checked with a development 
build, and yes, then I get 2.  So it seems that was really a bug that 
got fixed, glad to know this!

Thanks for pointing this out!

Daniel