Re: Baby Emacs?

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

kj <no.email@please.post> writes:

> I am teaching programming to a few co-workers (research biologists).
> Most of them want some recommendation for a text editor.  Of course,
> I recommend to them Emacs, but I would prefer to recommend a simpler
> version of Emacs, one with fewer features, and also fewer ways to
> get confused.  Is there such a thing?

Of course there's one:        emacs -Q

With the bonus of a faster launch, and quicker operation in general.



-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__