Re: regular expression

[Nuno J. Silva]

Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:

> * Nuno J. Silva [2010-01-25 13:35+0100] writes:
>
>> The second one works here. It has the result of hitting C-q C-j, instead
>> of \n, because there are other places where emacs won't match a newline
>> with \n, and needs this.
>
> Have you tried to include \r in the regexp?

I don't know if parens are the right way to make strings in regexps, but
none of the following worked (in the place where \n was):

\n\r

(\n\r)

(\r\n)

The last one looks silly, I wonder if any system uses such a line
break. The first one would catch any of the characters. As this is UNIX
I doubt there are carriage returns on my files (but emacs could use its
own internal convention for line breaks). 

-- 
Nuno J. Silva
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg