Re: dired without -l, wdired fails

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> Sometimes I like to see just `ls'-output. Would be great if other
>>> dired-functions work than too.
>> Plain "ls" output is difficult to parse reliably (though an appropriate
>> "ls --dired" would be fine, of course, and a Lisp implementation would
>> work as well).  OTOH "ls -1" is OK and should to work just fine with
>> `dired-virtual'.
> should I make a bug report for the issue?

I don't see a bug in this thread, but maybe it's because I haven't paid
enough attention.


        Stefan