help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: describe-text-properties: it's green, but says only "text"?


From: David Combs
Subject: Re: describe-text-properties: it's green, but says only "text"?
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 15:44:26 -0000

PLEASE -- because colors and text-properties and fontlock, etc,
have been difficult for me to completely grasp,
could SOMEONE say something about it, and also as
relates to my post, below.

I'd really appreciate it!

Thanks,

David


In article <hom1ql$5jd$1@panix3.panix.com>,
David Combs <dkcombs@panix.com> wrote:
>8mar10: describe-text-properties: it's green, but says only "text"?
>  c:/Documents and Settings/David/Desktop/ntemacs23/bin:
>
>subj: describe-text-properties: Text is green, but says only "text"?
>
>  c:/Documents and Settings/David/Desktop/ntemacs23/bin:
>
>
>So I try this one on it (from info: "30.12.3 Editing Format Information"):
>
>`Remove Text Properties'
>     Delete _all_ text properties from the region
>     (`facemenu-remove-all').
>and it REMOVES the GREEN!
>
>
>
>-----------------------
>
>Just for fun, I try this on it:
>`Remove Face Properties'
>     Delete from the region all face and color text properties
>     (`facemenu-remove-face-props').
>
>Same result -- removes thre green coloring.
>
>-----------------------
>
>
>
>
>So, looks like "text properties" has more than one meaning?
>
>
>QUESTION: Is there a command that tells me at least as much as what get's 
>REMOVED by 
>     facemenu-remove-face-props and facemenu-remove-all.
>
>
>What would REALLY be cool would be this:
>
>  Suppose something displays in green.
>
>  And it turns out that there's THREE different things map onto green, say
>  italic, bold, and heading.
>
>  What would be cool would be if  display text properties  would be able to
>  say "green (due to being one or more of: italic, bold, or heading)".
>     
>  (Implementation: slow.  So what? Who cares?  How often is it going
>  to get used?  Not very -- but when that info is needed, it's
>  *really* needed.)
>
>
>
>Suggestions?
>
>Thanks!
>
>David
>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]