[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tramp question
|
From: |
Michael Albinus |
|
Subject: |
Re: Tramp question |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:44:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> writes:
> Well maybe since "shell-command-to-string" is used non interactively it
> doesn't make sense for it to be so smart, since I should know what I'm
> doing.
>
> Might it be this the reason of this difference?
No, I don't believe that's the reason.
Anyway, I've checked the Emacs tree, and there are several dozen places
where `shell-command-to-string' is called. I fear we cannot simply
redefine its behaviour.
Best regards, Michael.