[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Uday S Reddy |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:12:04 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 6/5/2010 11:28 PM, Xah Lee wrote:
I respect your recognized contribution to humanity as a computer
programer. However, not sure if you are aware, that i've argued with
well known emacs and lisp old timers for the past 10 years
Thank God that some civility has returned to this thread!
to argue, first let's be precise what we are arguing about. Here's few
points:
• emacs 23's introduction of line-move-visual feature is good (or
bad).
• emacs 23's default of line-move-visual t good (or bad)
• the very concep of move by screen line is good (or bad).
No, I don't think that these are the questions that this debate is about.
(When we start debating what the debate is about, we should realize that we are
hopelessly knotted up in circles!)
Emacs 23 has a *visual line mode* and a *logical line mode* (the default mode
that you have whenever the visual-line-mode is /not/ turned on).
Everybody understands and expects that C-n moves by visual line in the visual
line mode. The question is, do you want it to move by visual line or logical
line in the *logical line mode*?
Let me repeat: do you want C-n to move by visual line or logical in the
*logical line mode*?
In the megabytes of debate that has gone on on this issue, I haven't seen a
single point mentioned as to why it should move by visual line in the logical
line mode. Yet, that is the default in Emacs 23! Worse, it *changes* the
semantics of C-n which as, Mark Crispin points out, has been here the 70's.
So, there are three things that an old-timer is annoyed about:
1. Change of established semantics.
2. Inconsistency.
3. Pointlessness.
Coupled with these real technical issues, there are the attitudinal problems of
holier-than-thou, smarter-than-thou and modern-than-thou and what have you. In
another part of this thread, we have also seen the astonishing idea that the
developers don't have to care about what the users want/need. If that is the
attitude that open source developers take, then I will be the first to give up
open source!
Cheers,
Uday
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/08
- proposed keyboard-macro to record to elisp (was Re: line-move-visual), Joseph Brenner, 2010/12/08
- Re: proposed keyboard-macro to record to elisp (was Re: line-move-visual), LanX, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Xah Lee, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Mark Crispin, 2010/12/09
- Re: line-move-visual, Xah Lee, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual,
Uday S Reddy <=
- Re: line-move-visual, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Alain Ketterlin, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Wrong use of format=flowed antidote, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Joost Kremers, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Helmut Eller, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Tim X, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Andreas Politz, 2010/12/08