Re: What's wrong with this code??

[Santanu]

On May 19, 2:04 am, Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> > Ah... I see. Now I understand. So, basically, just a single '\'
> > character in an elisp regexp string acts as if it wasn't even there in
> > the first place.
>
> Yes, except when it's a valid escape sequence, i.e. when the backslash
> is followed by r, t, ^, C, M, 0-9, x, o, d, e, a, b, v, LF, n, ", s, u,
> U, or f (and maybe a few more ;-).

Thanks. I will have to keep this in mind too.
Things now got a bit more complex :-)

Regards,
Santanu