[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:32:04 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> | Try to look at that file with "emacs -Q", to see if you can reproduce
> | the problem there.
> Same thing. I visit a file with 'über' (4 bytes/chars). This is
> initially displayed as \374ber (the \374 being one entity).
[...]
> character: \374 (252, #o374, #xfc)
> preferred charset: eight-bit (Raw bytes 128-255)
> code point: 0xFC
> syntax: w which means: word
> buffer code: #xFC
> file code: #xFC
> display: by this font (glyph code)
> x:-sony-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-120-100-100-c-80-iso8859-1 (#xFC)
I cannot reproduce it. What is your LANG/LC_ALL setting?
> I use unibyte in regular use.
How do you tell Emacs to use unibyte?
Stefan
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08