[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:32:40 -0000 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 21, 3:28 am, Ralf Fassel <ralf...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Now we still have basically all of our files in unibyte encoding, and
> the show as M\374ller, with the single-byte Umlauts as escape sequences,
> and word-movement stops at the non-ascii char. I found that if I
> customize the latin1-display Variable, they show up as Umlauts, and
> word-movement also behaves properly. Is setting latin1-display the
> Right Thing to work with the unibyte files?
No. The correct thing is to use latin-1 instead of unibyte if the
files are indeed latin-1. But this should happen by default.
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09