[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:33:01 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> However, a different, larger (800+kB) file which is also supposed to be
> latin-1 displays as "t:--- file", and the single-byte Umlauts are
> displayed as octal. How can I find out why emacs loads this file in 't'
> instead of '1'?
You can do the following:
- open the file
- set its coding-system to latin-1 with C-x RET f latin-1 RET
- try to save the file using the new coding system: C-x C-s
- this should hopefully pop up a window giving you a list of chars
that conflict.
Now this won't work quite right because it will list things like \374 as
well (since at that point Emacs doesn't know that those bytes should
have been read using the latin-1 coding-system), but the list should
hopefully also include some other chars.
But I still suggest you try what I already suggested:
| C-x RET r latin-1 RET should cause the file to be re-read as a latin-1
| file, and it should then be displayed properly.
and see what this gives.
Stefan
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, (continued)
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09