[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: condition-case
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: condition-case |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 04:56:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:43:29 -0500 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>> I mean *today* why shouldn't `handler-case' be part of Emacs? Is there
>>> anything blocking its inclusion in cl.el?
>
> SM> I can't remember hearing of even a rumor of a patch to implement it.
> SM> So, I guess that's the reason.
>
> OK. So, given the source code Pascal posted, and assuming he assigns
> the copyright, we could bring that into cl.el, right? Or will that not
> work?
There's no objection to assigning copyright to the FSF, I already did
that for some other code.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- Re: condition-case, (continued)
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/16
- Re: condition-case,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: condition-case, Elena, 2010/12/09
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/09